Comments on: Seven Different Linux/BSD Firewalls Reviewed http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/ a swift kick in the *nix Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:13:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Cooganut http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-6560 Cooganut Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:13:56 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-6560 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az2nPbd-bP0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az2nPbd-bP0

]]> By: Seven Different Linux/BSD Firewalls Reviewed | I · PC · CAR http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-6174 Seven Different Linux/BSD Firewalls Reviewed | I · PC · CAR Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:53:53 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-6174 [...] Seven Different Linux/BSD Firewalls Reviewed [...] [...] Seven Different Linux/BSD Firewalls Reviewed [...]

]]> By: Michael http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-6173 Michael Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:02:04 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-6173 m0n0wall is the best I think. m0n0wall is the best I think.

]]> By: DeusExtreme http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-6154 DeusExtreme Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:27:49 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-6154 Guy claims prostitute turned into a donkey ] Read the complete story here <a href="http://news.mykio.co.uk/latest/zb-aim-ste-ture-ne/" / rel="nofollow">Man claims prostitute turned into a donkey</a> If you have a Twitter account tweet your thoughts on this, let's see if we can make it go viral. Guy claims prostitute turned into a donkey ]

Read the complete story here Man claims prostitute turned into a donkey

If you have a Twitter account tweet your thoughts on this, let’s see if we can make it go viral.

]]> By: clareewhesora http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5991 clareewhesora Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:55:28 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5991 I am happy i decided to finally say hey to you all, i been trolling for months and now its time for action! I am happy i decided to finally say hey to you all, i been trolling for months and now its time for action!

]]> By: Looking for a straightforward linux router setup - Admins Goodies http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5893 Looking for a straightforward linux router setup - Admins Goodies Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:21:09 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5893 [...] is a review of quite a few Firewall distro’s that marks up pfSense as [...] [...] is a review of quite a few Firewall distro’s that marks up pfSense as [...]

]]> By: thirwetle http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5887 thirwetle Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:35:28 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5887 Abercrombie shop ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <a href="http://www.abercrombieandfitchoutletfr.com" rel="nofollow">Abercrombie france</a> Abercrombie shop

————————————————————————-
Abercrombie france

]]> By: europium http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5701 europium Mon, 03 May 2010 18:11:58 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5701 Now here's a novel idea: include >>links<< in your article. Such omissions are so commonplace that one cannot help but wonder if doing otherwise might violate some unspoken Code of Honour amongst the authors of such articles. And since I'm on a roll here, how's about including links to sources of information? For example, to paraphrase one article, "Drs. So and So discovered that quantum dots produce brilliant white light in a new type of LED." Word. No references. No links. Just verbiage. "Who the hell are Drs. So and So?" Who the hell knows? Result? An interesting article that goes nowhere fast. Coffee-table fluff. Please pass this little gem of an essay along to your editors, won't you? Sorry to be so crabby, folks, but this sort unprofessionalism really gets under my skin. I haven't the time to Google every useful vendor that comes down the pike, in addition to all the other things I need to do but don't have enough time for. Make it easier on busy people, won't you? Include links. Always! -e Now here’s a novel idea: include >>links<< in your article.

Such omissions are so commonplace that one cannot help but wonder if doing otherwise might violate some unspoken Code of Honour amongst the authors of such articles.

And since I'm on a roll here, how's about including links to sources of information? For example, to paraphrase one article, "Drs. So and So discovered that quantum dots produce brilliant white light in a new type of LED." Word.

No references. No links. Just verbiage. "Who the hell are Drs. So and So?" Who the hell knows? Result? An interesting article that goes nowhere fast. Coffee-table fluff.

Please pass this little gem of an essay along to your editors, won't you? Sorry to be so crabby, folks, but this sort unprofessionalism really gets under my skin. I haven't the time to Google every useful vendor that comes down the pike, in addition to all the other things I need to do but don't have enough time for. Make it easier on busy people, won't you? Include links. Always!

-e

]]> By: Mike http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5669 Mike Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:16:51 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5669 I came upon this site years ago, probably the same year that this article was blogged. I'm back again testing the same software, only this time in a VM and with much more knowledge. I had narrowed my choices down to 3 which are m0n0wall, Pfsense, smoothwall. The only thing I liked about smoothwall was the IM proxy and the footprint. Otherwise, it's features are pretty comparible to any router marketed today. I'd probably recommend this to the casual home network. I recently knocked it off my list beceause both m0n0wall and pfsense now support the IM proxy. Needless to say, both BSD versions of the routers have an extensive bandwidth implimentations including Advanced QoS bandwidth throttling AND shaping and both are able to successfully shape P2P traffic in ways that ISP's had done it based on L7. This is needed for todays highspeed internet and network traffic. Both have captive portals now and a wealth of security and other options FREE, that you probably wouldn't even find in a single package in 1000 dollar corporate switches. However Pfense seems to do better at all of this of m0n0wall, plus it has an integrated modular system which is a bonus, to add stuff from a repository. Now with 2.0 around the corner, there are a lot of improvments and new features like multi-wan, oh, and I pfense has VLAN, not just vlan tagging like the rest. Yup. I think I just convinced myself. I came upon this site years ago, probably the same year that this article was blogged. I’m back again testing the same software, only this time in a VM and with much more knowledge. I had narrowed my choices down to 3 which are m0n0wall, Pfsense, smoothwall. The only thing I liked about smoothwall was the IM proxy and the footprint. Otherwise, it’s features are pretty comparible to any router marketed today. I’d probably recommend this to the casual home network. I recently knocked it off my list beceause both m0n0wall and pfsense now support the IM proxy.

Needless to say, both BSD versions of the routers have an extensive bandwidth implimentations including Advanced QoS bandwidth throttling AND shaping and both are able to successfully shape P2P traffic in ways that ISP’s had done it based on L7. This is needed for todays highspeed internet and network traffic. Both have captive portals now and a wealth of security and other options FREE, that you probably wouldn’t even find in a single package in 1000 dollar corporate switches. However Pfense seems to do better at all of this of m0n0wall, plus it has an integrated modular system which is a bonus, to add stuff from a repository. Now with 2.0 around the corner, there are a lot of improvments and new features like multi-wan, oh, and I pfense has VLAN, not just vlan tagging like the rest.

Yup. I think I just convinced myself.

]]> By: ADW http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/7-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/comment-page-2/#comment-5536 ADW Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:38:56 +0000 http://www.fsckin.com/2007/11/14/seven-different-linuxbsd-firewalls-reviewed/#comment-5536 Excellent article & some interesting comments, has certainly given me food for thought. Any news on the next set of reviews? Excellent article & some interesting comments, has certainly given me food for thought. Any news on the next set of reviews?

]]>